| publication name | External Dacryocystorhinostomy versus Endoscopic Non-Laser D |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| year | 1950 |
| keywords | |
| journal | |
| volume | Not Available |
| issue | Not Available |
| pages | Not Available |
| publisher | Not Available |
| Local/International | Local |
| Paper Link | Not Available |
| Full paper | download |
| Supplementary materials | Not Available |
Abstract
External Dacryocystorhinostomy versus Endoscopic Non-Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy "A Comparative Study Abdel Samea M Khalil *, Ahmed S. Elkady, Abou-Bakr E Ras, Msaad A Elsisi, Hosam Abdel-Baki, Magdi A Fathi.* Departments of Otorhinolaryngologx and Ophthalmology*, Benha Faculty of Medicine. Abstract: Purpose: A retrospective study to compare outcomes after external dacryocystorhinostomy (Ex-DCR) and transnasal endoscopic assisted nonlaser dacryocystorhinostomy (End-DCR). Patients and Methods: A total of 214 Ex-DCR performed to 208 patients and a total 118 End-DCR of 1 16 patients were reviewed. The follow up period was at least one year. Three techniques were performed in each group. Results: Patency of the drainage system was assessed by history and irrigation. A full success was achieved in 86% of Ex-DCR group and 77.1% among End-DCR group by different techniques. The operating time, difficulties, postoperative recovery time and complications were compared. Conclusion: The Ex-DCR has a higher success rate compared to the End-DCR. However. End-DCR has a shorter operative time, no external scar and more suitable for recurrent cases.