أعضاء هيئة التدريس - جامعة بنها
External Dacryocystorhinostomy versus Endoscopic Non-Laser D
• 1950
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Not Available
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Not Available
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
Local
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
External Dacryocystorhinostomy versus Endoscopic Non-Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy "A Comparative Study
Abdel Samea M Khalil *, Ahmed S. Elkady, Abou-Bakr E Ras, Msaad A Elsisi, Hosam Abdel-Baki, Magdi A Fathi.*
Departments of Otorhinolaryngologx and Ophthalmology*, Benha Faculty of Medicine.
Abstract:
Purpose: A retrospective study to compare outcomes after external dacryocystorhinostomy (Ex-DCR) and transnasal endoscopic assisted nonlaser dacryocystorhinostomy (End-DCR). Patients and Methods: A total of 214 Ex-DCR performed to 208 patients and a total 118 End-DCR of 1 16 patients were reviewed. The follow up period was at least one year. Three techniques were performed in each group.
Results: Patency of the drainage system was assessed by history and irrigation. A full success was achieved in 86% of Ex-DCR group and 77.1% among End-DCR group by different techniques. The operating time, difficulties, postoperative recovery time and complications were compared.
Conclusion: The Ex-DCR has a higher success rate compared to the End-DCR. However. End-DCR has a shorter operative time, no external scar and more suitable for recurrent
cases.
Abdel Samea M Khalil *, Ahmed S. Elkady, Abou-Bakr E Ras, Msaad A Elsisi, Hosam Abdel-Baki, Magdi A Fathi.*
Departments of Otorhinolaryngologx and Ophthalmology*, Benha Faculty of Medicine.
Abstract:
Purpose: A retrospective study to compare outcomes after external dacryocystorhinostomy (Ex-DCR) and transnasal endoscopic assisted nonlaser dacryocystorhinostomy (End-DCR). Patients and Methods: A total of 214 Ex-DCR performed to 208 patients and a total 118 End-DCR of 1 16 patients were reviewed. The follow up period was at least one year. Three techniques were performed in each group.
Results: Patency of the drainage system was assessed by history and irrigation. A full success was achieved in 86% of Ex-DCR group and 77.1% among End-DCR group by different techniques. The operating time, difficulties, postoperative recovery time and complications were compared.
Conclusion: The Ex-DCR has a higher success rate compared to the End-DCR. However. End-DCR has a shorter operative time, no external scar and more suitable for recurrent
cases.