| publication name | Incorporation of the fluoroless C-Arm Trainer at the American Urological Association hands on training percutaneous renal access |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yasser A Noureldin, David M Hoenig , Philip Zhao , Sammy E Elsamra , Joshua Stern , Geoffrey Gaunay , Piruz Motamedinia , Zeph Okeke , Ardeshir R Rastinehad, Robert M Sweet |
| year | 2018 |
| keywords | Assessment; Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy; Skills; Training |
| journal | World Journal of Urology |
| volume | 36 |
| issue | 7 |
| pages | 1149-1155 |
| publisher | Springer |
| Local/International | International |
| Paper Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29455253/ |
| Full paper | download |
| Supplementary materials | Not Available |
Abstract
Objectives: To assess for usefulness and validity evidence for incorporating the C-Arm Trainer (CAT) simulator into the annual AUA hands on course for training percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and methods: The course started with a didactic session followed by four stations for training the "bull's eye" technique using the CAT simulator. Each station included a pre-test, 30-min practice on the simulator, and post-test. All participants were assessed using a 4-item checklist. All participants were asked to fill in a qualitative self-assessment questionnaire after the pre- and the post-test, and respond to a course evaluation questionnaire and post-course survey. Results: A total of 38 physicians, who attended the hands on course, voluntarily participated in the study. Only 21.1% had previous practice on PCNL simulators. Compared with the results of the checklist total score and the qualitative self-assessment questionnaire scores after the pre-test, there was significant improvement in the checklist total score (p < 0.001), temporal demands (p = 0.003), situational stress (p = 0.003, and performance (0.003) after the post-test. A total of 14 (36%) participants responded to the course evaluation questionnaire, 50% evaluated the course as excellent, 28.6% as very good, and 21.4% as good. Unfortunately, only five (13%) participants responded to the post-course survey, 4/5 implemented the new competencies and knowledge into their practice, and 3/5 have attempted to obtain fluoroscopic guided PCA without assistance. Conclusion: The CAT simulator was considered useful for training the percutaneous renal access procedure. There was significant improvement in the qualitative and quantitative assessment parameters after the post-test compared with the pre-test.