Incorporation of the da Vinci Surgical Skills SimulatorTM at Urology Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs): Pilot Study
Journal of Endourology • 2015
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Yasser Noureldin · Ana Stoica · Wassim Kassouf · Simon Tanguay · Franck Bladou · Sero Andonian
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Journal of Endourology
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
International
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Introduction and Objective: To evaluate the use of the da Vinci Surgical Skills SimulatorTM (dVSSS) in competency assessment of robotic skills of urology Post-Graduate Trainees (PGTs) during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs).
Methods: PGTs in Post-Graduate Years (PGY-3 to PGY-5) from two Quebec urology training programs were recruited. During a 20-minute OSCE station, PGTs were asked to fill in a questionnaire and perform two tasks: Pick and Place, and Energy Dissection level 1. For each exercise, the norm-referenced method was used to establish a passing score to determine competency. The participant was considered competent if he/she gained the passing score on both tasks.
Results: All 9 PGTs who attended the OSCE voluntarily participated in the study. They had performed a median of 10 (IQR: 2.5–16) laparoscopic procedures, 2 (0–8) robotic procedures, and assisted 10 (IQR: 0–15) robotic procedures at the bedside prior to this OSCE. Based on a passing score of 90 for task 1 and 72 for task 2, there were 3 (33%) competent PGTs, all of whom were from PGY-5 level. Therefore, there was significant difference among PGY levels in terms of competency (p = 0.01). When compared with PGTs, experts had performed significantly higher numbers of robotic procedures (5.2 – 2.4 vs. 25 – 8.7; p = 0.02). However, there was no significant difference in the performance parameters between PGTs and experts in both tasks.
Conclusion: This study confirms that the da Vinci Surgical Skills SimulatorTM was able to assess competency of urology PGTs during OSCE.
Methods: PGTs in Post-Graduate Years (PGY-3 to PGY-5) from two Quebec urology training programs were recruited. During a 20-minute OSCE station, PGTs were asked to fill in a questionnaire and perform two tasks: Pick and Place, and Energy Dissection level 1. For each exercise, the norm-referenced method was used to establish a passing score to determine competency. The participant was considered competent if he/she gained the passing score on both tasks.
Results: All 9 PGTs who attended the OSCE voluntarily participated in the study. They had performed a median of 10 (IQR: 2.5–16) laparoscopic procedures, 2 (0–8) robotic procedures, and assisted 10 (IQR: 0–15) robotic procedures at the bedside prior to this OSCE. Based on a passing score of 90 for task 1 and 72 for task 2, there were 3 (33%) competent PGTs, all of whom were from PGY-5 level. Therefore, there was significant difference among PGY levels in terms of competency (p = 0.01). When compared with PGTs, experts had performed significantly higher numbers of robotic procedures (5.2 – 2.4 vs. 25 – 8.7; p = 0.02). However, there was no significant difference in the performance parameters between PGTs and experts in both tasks.
Conclusion: This study confirms that the da Vinci Surgical Skills SimulatorTM was able to assess competency of urology PGTs during OSCE.
أعضاء هيئة التدريس - جامعة بنها