Staff Members - Benha University
Flexible ureterorenoscopy (RIRS) vs. Minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy (MINI‑PCNL) for renal stones 20–30 mm a prospective randomized study
af j urol • 2022
Publication Information
Authors
Ahmed Sebaey* , Ahmed Abou Taleb, Salah Elbashir, Rabie Gomaa, Ali Elshazli and Wael Saber
Keywords
Mini-PCNL, RIRS, Stone
Journal
af j urol
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
0 0:ja
Pages
xxxxx
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini PCNL) and retrograde
intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treatment of kidney stones 20–30 mm.
Methods: A prospective randomized study of 70 patients who presented to the urology department with calyceal or
renal pelvic stone of 20–30 mm between September 2017 and September 2019. Patients were randomly divided into
two groups, Group A (Mini PCNL) consists of 35 patients who were treated with mini PCNL and Group B (RIRS) consists
of 35 patients who were Achieving success of the technique was considered when the patient is stone-free or has
radiologically insignificant residual fragments < 4 mm.
Results: The demographic data in this study were comparable in both groups. The stone size was 20.43 ± 2.2 mm
in group A & 20.5 ± 2.1 in group B, with no statistical significance. Meanwhile, the operative time in group A was
59.71 ± 19.44 min and in group B was 80.43 ± 14.79 min with statistical significance difference (p value < 0.001), while
Fluoroscopy time had a mean of 8.11 ± 2.05 min in group A & 5.8 ± 1.98 min in group B with statistically significant
diffrence (p value < 0.001). The stone free rate (SFR) was 88.6% in mini PCNL and 82.9% in RIRS with no statistically
significant difference (p value: 0.5).
Conclusion: RIRS and mini PCNL can be an effective and alternative option for treatment of renal stones 2–3 cm.
Both techniques have relatively similar SFR but RIRS showed more operative time, on contrary Mini-PCNL has more
operative and postoperative complications. A multicenter studies with larger numbers of patients will be more effective
to confirm these results.
intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treatment of kidney stones 20–30 mm.
Methods: A prospective randomized study of 70 patients who presented to the urology department with calyceal or
renal pelvic stone of 20–30 mm between September 2017 and September 2019. Patients were randomly divided into
two groups, Group A (Mini PCNL) consists of 35 patients who were treated with mini PCNL and Group B (RIRS) consists
of 35 patients who were Achieving success of the technique was considered when the patient is stone-free or has
radiologically insignificant residual fragments < 4 mm.
Results: The demographic data in this study were comparable in both groups. The stone size was 20.43 ± 2.2 mm
in group A & 20.5 ± 2.1 in group B, with no statistical significance. Meanwhile, the operative time in group A was
59.71 ± 19.44 min and in group B was 80.43 ± 14.79 min with statistical significance difference (p value < 0.001), while
Fluoroscopy time had a mean of 8.11 ± 2.05 min in group A & 5.8 ± 1.98 min in group B with statistically significant
diffrence (p value < 0.001). The stone free rate (SFR) was 88.6% in mini PCNL and 82.9% in RIRS with no statistically
significant difference (p value: 0.5).
Conclusion: RIRS and mini PCNL can be an effective and alternative option for treatment of renal stones 2–3 cm.
Both techniques have relatively similar SFR but RIRS showed more operative time, on contrary Mini-PCNL has more
operative and postoperative complications. A multicenter studies with larger numbers of patients will be more effective
to confirm these results.