CERVICO – SACROPEXY AND VAGINO – SACROPEXY (CESA & VASA): A NEW PROCEDURES FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
• 2017
Publication Information
Authors
Ashraf Nassif Mahmoud Elmantwe and Tamer Mahmoud Assar
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Objective: To access the safety and efficacy outcomes of a new abdominal cervico – sacropexy (CESA) and vagi-no – sacropexy with CESA and VASA DynaMesh kit in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Patients and Methods: Prospective clinical study enrolled 10 women with posthysterectomy apical prolapse in Benha University Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, 7 women with vault prolapse while the other 3 women with apical prolapse with cer-vical stump. 7 women underwent VA-SA procedure while the other 3 under-went CESA procedure. ICS POP-Q staging as well as surgery related mor-bidity were evaluated.
Results: All women were followed up to 6 months postoperative. Significant postsurgical anatomical success were recorded across both POPQ anterior (point Aa, Ba) (P 0.001, P 0.0001) apical (point C, d) (P 0.0001, P 0.0001) and posterior (point Ap, Bp) (P 0.0003, P 0.0005) domains. No major complication were occurred. No mesh erosion were reported.
Conclusion: Cervico – sacropexy and vagino – sacropexy with CESA, VASA DynaMesh kit seems to be safe and effective option for women with ad-vanced post hysterectomy apical pro-lapse.
Abbreviat
Patients and Methods: Prospective clinical study enrolled 10 women with posthysterectomy apical prolapse in Benha University Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, 7 women with vault prolapse while the other 3 women with apical prolapse with cer-vical stump. 7 women underwent VA-SA procedure while the other 3 under-went CESA procedure. ICS POP-Q staging as well as surgery related mor-bidity were evaluated.
Results: All women were followed up to 6 months postoperative. Significant postsurgical anatomical success were recorded across both POPQ anterior (point Aa, Ba) (P 0.001, P 0.0001) apical (point C, d) (P 0.0001, P 0.0001) and posterior (point Ap, Bp) (P 0.0003, P 0.0005) domains. No major complication were occurred. No mesh erosion were reported.
Conclusion: Cervico – sacropexy and vagino – sacropexy with CESA, VASA DynaMesh kit seems to be safe and effective option for women with ad-vanced post hysterectomy apical pro-lapse.
Abbreviat
Staff Members - Benha University