Banner

Disparities of demographics, clinical characteristics, and hospital outcomes of AMI pilgrims vs non-pilgrims—tertiary center experience

• 2020
Back
Publication Information
Authors Sheeren Khaled, Walaa Eldeen Ahmed, Ghada Shalaby, Hadeel Alqasimi, Rahaf Abu Ruzaizah, Mryam Haddad, Mroj Alsabri, Seham Almalki, Heba Kufiah, Fatma Aboul Elnein and Najeeb Jaha
Keywords Not Available
Journal Not Available
Publisher Not Available
Volume Not Available
Issue Not Available
Pages Not Available
publication.type International
Paper Link Not Available
Supplementary Materials Not Available
Abstract
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is usually caused by rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque leading to
thrombotic occlusion of a coronary artery. Cardiovascular disease has recently emerged as the leading cause of death
during hajj. Our aim is to demonstrate the AMI pilgrim’s related disparities and comparing them to non-pilgrim patients.
Result: Out of 3044 of patients presented with AMI from January 2016 to August 2019, 1008 (33%) were pilgrims. They
were older in age (P < 0.001) and showed significantly lower rates cardiovascular risk factors (P < 0.001 for DM, smoking,
and obesity). Pilgrims were also less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy (P < 0.001), show lower rate of late AMI
presentation (P < 0.001), develop more LV dysfunction post AMI (P < 0.001), and have critical CAD anatomy in their
coronary angiography (P < 0.001 for MVD and = 0.02 for LM disease) compared to non-pilgrim AMI patients. Despite AMI
pilgrims recorded higher rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) procedures, they still showed poor
hospital outcomes (P < 0.001, 0.004, < 0.001, 0.05, and 0.001, respectively for pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock,
mechanical ventilation, cardiac arrest, and in-hospital mortality, respectively). Being a pilgrim and presence of significant
left ventricular systolic dysfunction, post AMI was the two independent predictors of mortality among our studied
patients (P = 0.005 and 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: Although AMI pilgrims had less cardiovascular risk factors and they were early revascularized, they showed
higher rates of post myocardial infarction complication and poor hospital outcomes. Implementation of pre-hajj
screening, awareness and education programs, and primary and secondary preventive measures should be taken in to
consideration to improve AMI pilgrim’s outcome.