Banner

Intestinal Parasite Infections and Accuracy of Direct Thin and Thick Smear, Formol-Ether Sedimentation, Centrifugal Flotation, and Mini-FLOTAC Techniques among Patients with Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders from the Greater Cairo Region, Egypt

• 2017
العودة
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون Atef H. Hussein,1* Samia M. Rashed,1 Ibrahim A. El-Hayawan,1 Nagwa S. M. Aly,1 Eman A. Abou Ouf,1 and Amira T. Ali1
الكلمات المفتاحية Not Available
المجلة العلمية Not Available
الناشر Not Available
المجلد Not Available
العدد Not Available
الصفحات Not Available
publication.type Local
رابط البحث Not Available
المواد المرفقة Not Available
الملخص
The aim of the present study was to assess the frequency of intestinal parasitic infection among
patients with gastrointestinal tract disorders from the Greater Cairo region, Egypt. In addition, a comparison was
made of the accuracy of direct thin and thick smear, formol-ether sedimentation (FEC), centrifugal flotation (CF), and
mini-FLOTAC techniques in the diagnosis of infection. Out of 100 patients, the overall prevalence of parasitic infection
was 51%. Only 6% had dual infection. Giardia lamblia was the most common parasite (26%), followed by
Hymenolepis nana (20%), Entamoeba coli (8%), and Enterobius vermicularis (3%). Except the statistically significant
association between E. vermicularis infection and perianal itching and insomnia (P < 0.001), age, gender, and complaints
of the examined individuals had no association with prevalence of parasitic infection. Both FEC and CF were
equally the most accurate techniques (accuracy = 98.2%, confidence interval [CI] = 0.95–1.0, and κ index = 0.962),
whereas the Kato-Katz method was the least accurate (accuracy = 67.5%, CI = 0.57–0.78, and κ index = 0.333).
However, mini-FLOTAC-ZnSO4 was the most accurate for diagnosis of helminthic infection, and FEC was more
accurate for diagnosis of protozoal infection (accuracy = 100%, CI = 1.0–1.0, and κ index = 1).