The association of urinary plasmin level with renal involvement and disease flare among systemic lupus erythematosus patients
• 2022
Publication Information
Authors
Rasha Fawzy1, Mounir Serag1, Amal Soliman1, Sania Elwia2, Samia Mojahed3
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
Local
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To explore the ability to use urinary level of plasmin as an indicator for renal affection and activity in systemic lupus erythematosus
(SLE) patients.
Patients and methods: Between April 2020 and October 2020, urine samples from 50 SLE patients (2 males, 48 females; mean age: 35.5±8.1 years;
range, 22 to 39 years) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (2 males, 18 females; mean age: 34.1±6.5 years; range, 27 to 38) were collected.
The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of renal manifestations as those with renal disease (n=28) and
those without renal disease (n=22). The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), renal activity (rSLEDAI), and Systemic Lupus
International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (SLICC-DI) scores were calculated. Renal biopsy was performed to patients with active lupus
nephritis (LN). The activity index (AI) and Chronicity Index (CI) were scored.
Results: There was a highly statistically significant difference in the mean urinary plasmin levels between SLE cases and the control
group (88.9±42.6 ng/mL vs. 21.3±26.8 ng/mL, respectively; p
Objectives: To explore the ability to use urinary level of plasmin as an indicator for renal affection and activity in systemic lupus erythematosus
(SLE) patients.
Patients and methods: Between April 2020 and October 2020, urine samples from 50 SLE patients (2 males, 48 females; mean age: 35.5±8.1 years;
range, 22 to 39 years) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (2 males, 18 females; mean age: 34.1±6.5 years; range, 27 to 38) were collected.
The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of renal manifestations as those with renal disease (n=28) and
those without renal disease (n=22). The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), renal activity (rSLEDAI), and Systemic Lupus
International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (SLICC-DI) scores were calculated. Renal biopsy was performed to patients with active lupus
nephritis (LN). The activity index (AI) and Chronicity Index (CI) were scored.
Results: There was a highly statistically significant difference in the mean urinary plasmin levels between SLE cases and the control
group (88.9±42.6 ng/mL vs. 21.3±26.8 ng/mL, respectively; p
Staff Members - Benha University