Combined serum and immunohistochemical differentiation between reactive, and malignant mesothelial proliferations
• 2015
Publication Information
Authors
Gehan F. Al mehy a,*, Ghada A. Abd El-Fattah b, Mohebat H. Gouda b,
Rasha M. El-Sawi b, Mostafa M. Amer c
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) carries a poor prognosis and response
rates to palliative chemotherapy remain low. The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma is frequently
difficult, the most common differential diagnosis being reactive pleural conditions and metastatic
adenocarcinoma. Several studies have used immunohistochemical markers to distinguish between
reactive and neoplastic mesothelial cells. Soluble mesothelin levels in serum have recently been
shown to be highly specific and moderately sensitive for mesothelioma. A combined detection of
serum levels of mesothelin and immunohistochemical expression of desmin and EMA are used in
order to differentiate between reactive mesothelial proliferations, and malignant mesothelioma of
epithelioid type.
Patients and methods: This prospective study includes 17 cases of reactive mesothelial proliferations,
6 cases of atypical mesothelial proliferations and 13 cases of MM. Cases were collected from
the Chest Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University and International Medical Center
(IMC), in the period 2012–2014. Desmin and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunohistochemical
staining were performed in all cases and the pattern of expression was analyzed.
Soluble mesothelin related peptide (SMRP) was estimated for all cases.
Results: Desmin expression was positive in 88.2%, 0%, and 7.7% of reactive mesothelial proliferations,
atypical mesothelial proliferations and MM respectively. EMA was positive in 5.9% of reactive mesothelial proliferation, 100% of atypical mesothelial proliferations and 92.3% of MM
cases (P
rates to palliative chemotherapy remain low. The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma is frequently
difficult, the most common differential diagnosis being reactive pleural conditions and metastatic
adenocarcinoma. Several studies have used immunohistochemical markers to distinguish between
reactive and neoplastic mesothelial cells. Soluble mesothelin levels in serum have recently been
shown to be highly specific and moderately sensitive for mesothelioma. A combined detection of
serum levels of mesothelin and immunohistochemical expression of desmin and EMA are used in
order to differentiate between reactive mesothelial proliferations, and malignant mesothelioma of
epithelioid type.
Patients and methods: This prospective study includes 17 cases of reactive mesothelial proliferations,
6 cases of atypical mesothelial proliferations and 13 cases of MM. Cases were collected from
the Chest Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University and International Medical Center
(IMC), in the period 2012–2014. Desmin and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) immunohistochemical
staining were performed in all cases and the pattern of expression was analyzed.
Soluble mesothelin related peptide (SMRP) was estimated for all cases.
Results: Desmin expression was positive in 88.2%, 0%, and 7.7% of reactive mesothelial proliferations,
atypical mesothelial proliferations and MM respectively. EMA was positive in 5.9% of reactive mesothelial proliferation, 100% of atypical mesothelial proliferations and 92.3% of MM
cases (P
Staff Members - Benha University