Banner

Intestinal parasite infections and accuracy of direct thin and thick smear, formol-ether sedimentation, centrifugal flotation and Mini-FLOTAC techniques among patients with gastrointestinal tract disorders from the Greater Cairo region, Egypt.

American journal of tropical medicine and Hygiene • 2017
Back
Publication Information
Authors Husseein A;Rashed SM ;Elhayawan I.; Aly Nagwa SM; Ouf EA and Thanaa A
Keywords flotac; intestinal parasites
Journal American journal of tropical medicine and Hygiene
Publisher Not Available
Volume Not Available
Issue Not Available
Pages 589 - 594
publication.type International
Paper Link Open Link
Supplementary Materials Not Available
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the frequency of intestinal parasitic infection among patients with
gastrointestinal tract disorders from the Greater Cairo region, Egypt. In addition, a comparison was made of the
accuracy of direct thin and thick smear, formol-ether sedimentation (FEC), centrifugal flotation (CF), and mini-
FLOTAC techniques in the diagnosis of infection. Out of 100 patients, the overall prevalence of parasitic infection
was 51%. Only 6% had dual infection. Giardia lamblia was the most common parasite (26%), followed by
Hymenolepis nana (20%), Entamoeba coli (8%), and Enterobius vermicularis (3%). Except the statistically
significant association between E. vermicularis infection and perianal itching and insomnia (P < 0.001), age, gender,
and complaints of the examined individuals had no association with prevalence of parasitic infection. Both FEC and
CF were equally the most accurate techniques (accuracy = 98.2%, confidence interval [CI] = 0.95–1.0, and  index
= 0.962), whereas the Kato-Katz method was the least accurate (accuracy = 67.5%, CI = 0.57–0.78, and  index =
0.333). However, mini-FLOTAC-ZnSO4 was the most accurate for diagnosis of helminthic infection, and FEC was
more accurate for diagnosis of protozoal infection (accuracy = 100%, CI = 1.0–1.0, and  index = 1).