Which is more important in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of solitary renal stones: stone location or stone burden?
• 2012
Publication Information
Authors
Mostafa Khalil
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Open Link
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect of stone location and burden on the outcome of the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) as a primary treatment of solitary renal stone.
Patients and methods: The study included 438 patients with a solitary renal stone who underwent SWL. All were evaluated by plain film of kidneys, ureters and bladder (KUB), ultrasonography, intravenous urography (IVU), or non-contrast enhanced CT. Patients were classified into four groups according to stone location (renal pelvis, lower, middle, and upper calyx) and three groups according to stone burden (≤ 1 cm2, 1.1-2 cm2, and > 2cm2).Treatment outcome was considered successful if no residual fragments (stone free) or clinically insignificant non obstructing residuals less than 4 mm were remained after 3 months of follow up.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 45.1± 12.5 years. The mean stone burden, number of sessions and shock waves for the whole study were 1.3± 0.49 cm2, 2.1±0.7 sessions and 5616.6±2017.4 shock waves, respectively. The stone free rate of the study was 65.1%. The stone free rates of the stones in the renal pelvis, lower, middle, and upper calyces were 72.4%, 56%, 55.6%, and 69%, respectively. The stone free rate of the stones ≤ 1 cm2, 1.1-2 cm2, and > 2cm2 was 50.2%, 39.6%, and 10.2%, respectively (P
Patients and methods: The study included 438 patients with a solitary renal stone who underwent SWL. All were evaluated by plain film of kidneys, ureters and bladder (KUB), ultrasonography, intravenous urography (IVU), or non-contrast enhanced CT. Patients were classified into four groups according to stone location (renal pelvis, lower, middle, and upper calyx) and three groups according to stone burden (≤ 1 cm2, 1.1-2 cm2, and > 2cm2).Treatment outcome was considered successful if no residual fragments (stone free) or clinically insignificant non obstructing residuals less than 4 mm were remained after 3 months of follow up.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 45.1± 12.5 years. The mean stone burden, number of sessions and shock waves for the whole study were 1.3± 0.49 cm2, 2.1±0.7 sessions and 5616.6±2017.4 shock waves, respectively. The stone free rate of the study was 65.1%. The stone free rates of the stones in the renal pelvis, lower, middle, and upper calyces were 72.4%, 56%, 55.6%, and 69%, respectively. The stone free rate of the stones ≤ 1 cm2, 1.1-2 cm2, and > 2cm2 was 50.2%, 39.6%, and 10.2%, respectively (P
Staff Members - Benha University