Staff Members - Benha University
Laparoscopic Suture versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for the surgical Treatment of Internal Rectal Prolapse
Benha medical Journal • 2022
Publication Information
Authors
Mohamed I. Abuelnasr, Hussein Elgohary, A.A.Nuh, Mohamed A. Elbegawy
Keywords
Rectal prolapse; Rectopexy; Suture rectopexy; Ventral rectopex
Journal
Benha medical Journal
Publisher
benha medical journal
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
Local
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Mohamed Atef mohamed _Screenshot_٢٠٢٢-٠٩-١٦-٢٢-٥٩-١٠-٢٤_6012fa4d4ddec268fc5c7112cbb265e7.jpg
Abstract
Background; Over the last decades, numerous procedures have been proposed to treat rectal
prolapse (RP) often with contrasting results, underlying the continuing search for the ideal
surgical treatment. This should correct RP and/or rectal intussusception (RI) and derived
symptoms. This study aims to evaluate and compare the functional outcome after laparoscopic
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy and laparoscopic suture Rectopexy for the surgical Treatment of Internal
Rectal Prolapse Subjects and methods; This was prospective study, was carried out in General
Surgery Department of Benha University Hospital on 30 patients with internal rectal prolapse
those randomly divided into 2 groups: (Group A): 15 patients who were proposed to do
laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, (Group B): 15 patients who were proposed to do
laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Results; Ventral Mesh Rectopexy operation time was highly
significantly longer than Laparoscopic Suture. There was no significant difference between the
two groups regarding intra operative complications except one case of bleeding in LSR group. Conclusion; Both laparoscopic mesh rectopexy and suture rectopexy are feasible and reliable
methods for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse associated with low recurrence rate, improvement of ODS symptoms and better anorectal function.
prolapse (RP) often with contrasting results, underlying the continuing search for the ideal
surgical treatment. This should correct RP and/or rectal intussusception (RI) and derived
symptoms. This study aims to evaluate and compare the functional outcome after laparoscopic
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy and laparoscopic suture Rectopexy for the surgical Treatment of Internal
Rectal Prolapse Subjects and methods; This was prospective study, was carried out in General
Surgery Department of Benha University Hospital on 30 patients with internal rectal prolapse
those randomly divided into 2 groups: (Group A): 15 patients who were proposed to do
laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, (Group B): 15 patients who were proposed to do
laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Results; Ventral Mesh Rectopexy operation time was highly
significantly longer than Laparoscopic Suture. There was no significant difference between the
two groups regarding intra operative complications except one case of bleeding in LSR group. Conclusion; Both laparoscopic mesh rectopexy and suture rectopexy are feasible and reliable
methods for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse associated with low recurrence rate, improvement of ODS symptoms and better anorectal function.