Comparative Study Between Custodiol® versus Cold Blood Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection in Double Valve Replacement Surgery
The Egyptian Cardiothoracic Surgeon • 2021
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Moataz Rezk, Ashraf Wahdan, Mahmoud Mubarak, Mamdouh Mohamed, Mohammed Elgazzar
الكلمات المفتاحية
Double valve replacement; Cold Blood Cardioplegia; Custodiol®
المجلة العلمية
The Egyptian Cardiothoracic Surgeon
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
Local
رابط البحث
Open Link
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Background: Several cardioplegic solutions are available for myocardial preservation. The superiority of intracellular over extracellular cardioplegia is still debated. Our study aimed to compare the results of Custodiol® and blood Cardioplegia for myocardial protection in double valve replacement surgery.
Methods: This is a prospective study that included 301 patients. We grouped the patient into; Group A (n= 135) had Custodiol® cardioplegia, and Group B (n= 166) had cold blood cardioplegia. We included patients who had double valve surgery and excluded redo, emergency procedures, and patients who had concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.
Results: Patients in Group A were significantly younger (43 ±9 vs. 47 ±10, P
Methods: This is a prospective study that included 301 patients. We grouped the patient into; Group A (n= 135) had Custodiol® cardioplegia, and Group B (n= 166) had cold blood cardioplegia. We included patients who had double valve surgery and excluded redo, emergency procedures, and patients who had concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.
Results: Patients in Group A were significantly younger (43 ±9 vs. 47 ±10, P
أعضاء هيئة التدريس - جامعة بنها