Theme-Logo
  • Login
  • Home
  • Course
  • Publication
  • Theses
  • Reports
  • Published books
  • Workshops / Conferences
  • Supervised PhD
  • Supervised MSc
  • Supervised projects
  • Education
  • Language skills
  • Positions
  • Memberships and awards
  • Committees
  • Experience
  • Scientific activites
  • In links
  • Outgoinglinks
  • News
  • Gallery
publication name Management of Medial Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis using the Oxford Knee
Authors Mohamed E1 Ashhab, MD.
year 2011
keywords
journal
volume Not Available
issue Not Available
pages Not Available
publisher Not Available
Local/International Local
Paper Link Not Available
Full paper download
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract

Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a surgical procedure used to relieve arthritis in one of the knee compartments in which the damaged parts of the knee are replaced. UKA surgery may reduce post-operative pain and have a shorter recovery period than a total knee replacement. Also, UKA may have a smaller incision because the implants may be smaller. Patients and Methods Over a period of30 months, 11 patients with medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee underwent partial knee replacement using the Oxford unicompartmental knee. Seven patients were females and 4 were males with a mean age 47.2 years (range 43 -55 years). Proper patients' selection was done based on clinical, lab and radiological examination. The patients' condition was assessed clinically using the Knee Society Score wltich is divided into a knee score and a functional score. The patients were followed up for a mean of 15 months (range 3 -27 months). Results Post-operatively due to strict indications for surgery, 9 patients (81.8%) reported adequate reliefofpain. Regarding the Knee Society Score, the Knee component had an average 85 points (73 -92) and the functional component had an average 83 points (69 -90). The average flexion range was 119° and average fIXed flexion was 6°. The plain radiographs showed 8 Knees in varus alignment with a mean of 4° varus and 3 knees in valgus alignment with a mean of 2.5°. Four knees showed degeneration ofthe patellofemoral joint and in two knees the lateral compartment showed signs of degeneration. One case shows post-operative dislocation of the insert which was reduced by open reduction with no recurrence. Conclusion Unicompartmental knee replacement is a worthwhile procedure in selected patients. It replaces the missing bearing surface only and in the tibiofemoral joint should not be used to correct extra-articular alignment. When successful it can allow patients to return to near normal existence for their age.

Benha University © 2023 Designed and developed by portal team - Benha University