Banner

VATS versus Ultrasound-Guided Abram`S Needle Biopsy in Diagnosis of Pleural Diseases

• 2022
Back
Publication Information
Authors Ahmed S. Emara, Yousry E. Rezk, Anhar El moteleb, Heba Abo El kheir, Ashraf M. Elnahas
Keywords Not Available
Journal Not Available
Publisher Not Available
Volume Not Available
Issue Not Available
Pages Not Available
publication.type Local
Paper Link Not Available
Supplementary Materials Not Available
Abstract
Background:VATS and transthoracic ultrasound-guided
Abram`s needle biopsy are important techniques in diagnosis of
pleural diseases, as they are more accurate than blind closed pleural
biopsies. Patients & Methods: This is a prospective study, which
included 60 patients of undiagnosed pleural diseases who were
randomly divided into two groups: group A (30 patients) who
underwent VATS biopsy, and group B (30 patients) who underwent
U/S guided Abram`s needle biopsy. Efficacy and safety and of both
procedures were compared. Results: There were no perioperative
mortality and both procedures were safe. A definitive histopathological
diagnosis was obtained in 30 patients (100%) in group A and in 26
patients (86.7%) in group B. Complications in group A were minor
bleeding in 1 (14.3%), lung collapse in 3 (42.9%), empyema in 1
(14.3%), prolonged air leakage in 1(14.3%) and wound infection in 1
(14.3%). Complications in group B were empyema in 1 (12.5%),
hemoptysis in 2 (25%), vasovagal attack in 1 (12.5%) and
pneumothorax in 4 (50%). Conclusions: VATS is a safe and accurate
method for diagnosis of pleural lesions and pleural effusions and more sensitive than US
guided Abram`s needle biopsy. VATS is an effective method in diagnosis of pleural
effusion due to both pleural and pulmonary causes. The results of U/S guided Abram`s needle
biopsy for pleural causes of pleural effusions is better than the results of U/S guided Abram`s
needle biopsy for pulmonary causes of pleural effusions