| publication name | VATS versus Ultrasound-Guided Abram`S Needle Biopsy in Diagnosis of Pleural Diseases |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ahmed S. Emara, Yousry E. Rezk, Anhar El moteleb, Heba Abo El kheir, Ashraf M. Elnahas |
| year | 2022 |
| keywords | |
| journal | |
| volume | Not Available |
| issue | Not Available |
| pages | Not Available |
| publisher | Not Available |
| Local/International | Local |
| Paper Link | Not Available |
| Full paper | download |
| Supplementary materials | Not Available |
Abstract
Background:VATS and transthoracic ultrasound-guided Abram`s needle biopsy are important techniques in diagnosis of pleural diseases, as they are more accurate than blind closed pleural biopsies. Patients & Methods: This is a prospective study, which included 60 patients of undiagnosed pleural diseases who were randomly divided into two groups: group A (30 patients) who underwent VATS biopsy, and group B (30 patients) who underwent U/S guided Abram`s needle biopsy. Efficacy and safety and of both procedures were compared. Results: There were no perioperative mortality and both procedures were safe. A definitive histopathological diagnosis was obtained in 30 patients (100%) in group A and in 26 patients (86.7%) in group B. Complications in group A were minor bleeding in 1 (14.3%), lung collapse in 3 (42.9%), empyema in 1 (14.3%), prolonged air leakage in 1(14.3%) and wound infection in 1 (14.3%). Complications in group B were empyema in 1 (12.5%), hemoptysis in 2 (25%), vasovagal attack in 1 (12.5%) and pneumothorax in 4 (50%). Conclusions: VATS is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of pleural lesions and pleural effusions and more sensitive than US guided Abram`s needle biopsy. VATS is an effective method in diagnosis of pleural effusion due to both pleural and pulmonary causes. The results of U/S guided Abram`s needle biopsy for pleural causes of pleural effusions is better than the results of U/S guided Abram`s needle biopsy for pulmonary causes of pleural effusions