Banner

Efficacy of intraperitoneal versus intravenous lidocaine for postcesarean pain relief

Evidence Based Women’s Health Journal • 2016
Back
Publication Information
Authors Ahmed Walid Anwar Murada , Mohamed Abd Elhadi Faraga , Mahmoud Abosriea, Ehab Saeed Abd Alazeemb and Ahmed Mostafa
Keywords cesarean, intraperitoneal, intravenous, lidocaine, pain
Journal Evidence Based Women’s Health Journal
Publisher Not Available
Volume 6
Issue Not Available
Pages 144-148.
publication.type Local
Paper Link Not Available
Supplementary Materials Not Available
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate intraperitoneal (IP) lidocaine administration and
intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control after cesarean
section.
Study design
This is a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Patients and methods
A total of 165 pregnant full-term women who were indicated for elective cesarean
delivery for various indications were randomized equally to either group C (control, IP
and IV saline), group IP (IP lidocaine administration), or group IV (IV lidocaine infusion).
Five patients were excluded from each group for various reasons. The outcome
measures were postoperative pain scoring, total pethidine consumption, and the need
for postoperative analgesia.
Results
There was significantly reduced visual analogue scale scores after 4 h, total pethidine
consumption in 24 h, time to ambulation, onset of pain relief, and the need for rescue
analgesia in groups IV and IP compared with controls. Postoperative nausea and
vomiting were less frequently noted in groups IP and IV than in group C, but this trend
was not statistically significant.
Conclusion
The IP lidocaine instillation and IV lidocaine infusion significantly reduced
postoperative pain and opioid consumption in women who underwent elective
cesarean section, compared with control infusions.