Theme-Logo
  • Login
  • Home
  • Course
  • Publication
  • Theses
  • Reports
  • Published books
  • Workshops / Conferences
  • Supervised PhD
  • Supervised MSc
  • Supervised projects
  • Education
  • Language skills
  • Positions
  • Memberships and awards
  • Committees
  • Experience
  • Scientific activites
  • In links
  • Outgoinglinks
  • News
  • Gallery
publication name Smashing the Implementation Records of AES S-box
Authors Reyhani-Masoleh, Arash and Taha, Mostafa and Ashmawy, Doaa
year 2018
keywords
journal IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
volume 2018
issue 2
pages Not Available
publisher IACR
Local/International International
Paper Link https://tches.iacr.org/index.php/TCHES/article/view/884
Full paper download
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract

Canright S-box has been known as the most compact S-box design since its introduction back in CHES’05. Boyar-Peralta proposed logic-minimization heuristics that could reduce the gate count of Canright S-box from 120 gates to 113 gates, however synthesis results did not reflect much improvement. In CHES’15, Ueno et al. proposed an S-box that has a slightly higher area, but significantly faster than the previous designs, hence it was the most efficient (measured by area×delay) S-box implementation to date. In this paper, we propose two new designs for the AES S-box. One design has a smaller implementation area than both Canright and the 113-gate S-boxes. Hence, our first design is the smallest AES S-box to date, breaking the 13 years implementation record of Canright. The second design is faster and smaller than the Ueno S-box. Hence, our second design is both the fastest and the most efficient S-box design to date. While doing so, we also propose new logicminimization heuristics that outperform the previous algorithms of Boyar-Peralta. Finally, we conduct an exhaustive evaluation of each and every block in the S-box circuit, using both structural and behavioral HDL modeling, to reach the optimum synergy between theoretical algorithms and technology-supported optimization tools. We show that involving the technology-supported CAD tools in the analysis results in several counter-intuitive results.

Benha University © 2023 Designed and developed by portal team - Benha University