أعضاء هيئة التدريس - جامعة بنها
Incidence and predictors of mismatch after mechanical mitral valve replacement
• 2019
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Ashraf AH El Midany1 , Ezzeldin A Mostafa1 , Tamer Hikal1,
Mostafa G Elbarbary1, Ayman Doghish1, Ramy Khorshid1 ,
Basem M Abdelgawad2 , Mohamed Sharaa3,
Ismail N El-Sokkary3, Mohamed El Hossiny3,
Haytham Abdelmoaty3 and Bahaa A Elkhonezy3
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Not Available
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
International
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Patient-prosthesis mismatch after mitral valve replacement has an unfavorable postoperative hemodynamic
outcome, which underlines the importance of identifying and preventing prosthesis- and patient-related risk
factors. This study was conducted to determine the incidence and identify possible predictors of patientprosthesis
mismatch.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 715 patients with a mean age of 4211 years who underwent
mechanical mitral valve replacement between 2013 and 2017. The effective orifice area of the prostheses was estimated
by the continuity equation, and a mismatch was defined as an effective orifice area index 1.2 cm2m
2. The mean
clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 26.7411.58 months. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to
identify predictors of patient-prosthesis mismatch.
Results: Patient-prosthesis mismatch was detected in 382 (53.4%) patients. A small mechanical prosthesis (
outcome, which underlines the importance of identifying and preventing prosthesis- and patient-related risk
factors. This study was conducted to determine the incidence and identify possible predictors of patientprosthesis
mismatch.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 715 patients with a mean age of 4211 years who underwent
mechanical mitral valve replacement between 2013 and 2017. The effective orifice area of the prostheses was estimated
by the continuity equation, and a mismatch was defined as an effective orifice area index 1.2 cm2m
2. The mean
clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 26.7411.58 months. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to
identify predictors of patient-prosthesis mismatch.
Results: Patient-prosthesis mismatch was detected in 382 (53.4%) patients. A small mechanical prosthesis (