| publication name | Comparison of Cardiac Output and Hemodynamic Responses of Intubation among Different Videolaryngoscopies in Normotensive and Hypertensive Patients |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amro Faez !bddgawad 1.2. Qin-fang Sl-II (;G #-'*) I. Mohamed Abo Ilalawa1, Zhi-lin WU (,k,(..;/,f.)1. Zhou-yang WU (ii\'ill fEl)I, Xiang-dong CHEN (11.4=. {oJ It. )1, Shang-long YAO (-!ljtr~ ;1£)1# |
| year | 2015 |
| keywords | |
| journal | |
| volume | Not Available |
| issue | Not Available |
| pages | Not Available |
| publisher | Not Available |
| Local/International | International |
| Paper Link | Not Available |
| Full paper | download |
| Supplementary materials | Not Available |
Abstract
Tracheal intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope (MAC) might result in severe cardiovascular com pi ications. Thc results of conducted studies investigating the effects of videolaryngoscopies on hemodynamic response of tracheal intubation are cont1icting. We know little about the effects of videolaryngoscopies on cardiac output changes during tracheal intubation. We compared cardiac output (COP) and hcmodynamic responses in normal blood pressure (n=60) and hypertensive patients (n=60) among 3 intubation devices: the MAC, the UE videolaryngoscopy ® (UE). and the UE video intubation stylet ® (VS). Cardiac index (CI). stroke volume index (SVI), heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded using LidcoRapid V2® preinduction, preintubation, and eery minute for the first 5 min after intubation. We assessed oropharyngeal and laryngeal structures injury as cli. Intubation time as significantly shorter than MAC groups (P