Comparative Study between using Lowenstein Jensen, Bio-FM media and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) System in Identification of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiolog • 2012
Publication Information
Authors
Amal M. Saeed¹, Nehad A. Fouad¹ and Tarek S. Essawy2
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiolog
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Background/Aim Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be one of the most important infectious diseases threatening the human health. Culture systems are used for isolation of tuberculous bacilli as they are more sensitive than smear microscopy. The Aim of the work was to evaluate the detection rate and time of mycobacterium tuberculosis by using the Bio FM system and mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) system in comparison with the Lowenstein-Jensen medium. Methods: This study was carried out on a total 60 smear acid fast bacilli positive sputum samples obtained from patients attending Chest Department and Outpatient Clinic of Benha University Hospital, Benha Chest Hospital, from June 2011 to September of the same year. Patients were classified into three groups: Group I: included 40 patients with fresh sputum smear +ve (new cases) Group II: included 13 relapsed cases and Group III: included 7 treatment failure cases. All sputum samples were cultured in parallel on Bio-FM, MGIT and LJ media. The mycobacterial detection rate and time were compared. Results: The mycobacteria recovery rate on MGIT, Bio- FM and LJ were not significantly different (respectively 98.3%, 95% and 93 %, P > 0.05). The growth of M. tuberculosi was faster on MGIT then on Bio-FM (mean 10.7±2.9 days, 11.1±4.3 days respectively vs. 23.6±8.1 days for LJ, there was statistically significant difference between L.J and Bio-FM and L.J and MGIT, However there was no statistically significant when comparing MGIT and Bio-FM.
In conclusion: MGIT, BioFM media were better than LJ medium in recovery rate and detection time of mycobacterial growth.
In conclusion: MGIT, BioFM media were better than LJ medium in recovery rate and detection time of mycobacterial growth.
Staff Members - Benha University