Banner

Neurolysis for secondary sciatic nerve entrapment: evaluation of surgical feasibility and functional outcome

• 2014
العودة
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون Islam Aboulfetouh & Ahmed Saleh
الكلمات المفتاحية Not Available
المجلة العلمية Not Available
الناشر Not Available
المجلد Not Available
العدد Not Available
الصفحات Not Available
publication.type Local
رابط البحث Not Available
المواد المرفقة Not Available
الملخص
Background The study included 11 patients; seven males
and four females with mean age of 68.3±11 years. All
patients had sciatic nerve entrapment: three had a penetrating
injury, three suffered postoperative trauma, two
had a crush injury, two had inadvertent injections and
one was trapped in a machine belt. Clinical examination
included: an evaluation of the extent of motor and
sensory impacts according to the British Medical Research
Council (BMRC) scale and the Semmes-
Weinstein monofilament test; assessment of pain sensation
using the visual analogue scale (VAS); electromyography;
and nerve conduction velocitiey determination.
The applied operative procedure for sciatic neurolysis
was modulated according to the suspected site of sciatic
nerve entrapment. At 6 and 12 months after surgery all
patients were evaluated for recovery of motor and sensory
function.
Results All patients passed the smooth intraoperative
course within a mean operative time of 77.7±21 min.
The mean duration of wound drainage and postoperative
hospital stay was 2.6±0.7 and 4.8±0.8 days, respectively.
Pain sensation showed progressive significant improvement
in nine patients but decreased at time of
discharge and remained stationary till 12-m post-operative
(PO). Recovery of motor function showed progressive
significant improvement at 6 and 12 months after
sciatic nerve neurolysis. The frequency of patients having
muscle power recovery and regained sensation was
significantly higher at 6-m and 12-m PO as compared to
preoperative grading with a significantly higher frequency
at the 6-m grading compared to preoperative grading.
Two patients showed no change of their muscle strength
grade, while nine patients showed improvement for a
total success rate of motor strength recovery of 81.8%.
At 6- m PO five patients showed no change of their
sensory group, while six patients showed improvement
for a total success rate of sensation recovery of 54.5%.
At 12-m PO ten patients had fullly recovered protective
sensation for a success rate of 90.9%.
Conclusion Surgical exploration and neurolysis of cases with
sciatic nerve entrapment is a safe and effective therapeutic
modality with significant improvement of both motor and
sensory functions without risk of additional deficit secondary
to neurolysis.