Acute effect of sildenafil on myocardial ischemic territories in patients with stable coronary artery disease
The Egyptian Heart Journal • 2014
Publication Information
Authors
Mohamed Salem, Ahmed Bendary, Shaimaa Moustafa, Ahmed Ramzy, Osama Sanad
Keywords
Sildenafil; Coronary artery disease; Stable angina
Journal
The Egyptian Heart Journal
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Volume
Volume 65
Issue
Issue 1, March 2013
Pages
Pages 21-29
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Open Link
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To test the safety of sildenafil in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods
Sixty-one patients with stable CAD, documented by coronary angiography were included in this phase I study. Patients were randomized to either single dose sildenafil or matched placebo. Speckle tracking echocardiography was done at baseline and 60 min after sildenafil/placebo intake to calculate peak systolic strain (PSS) of the most severely affected myocardial segments and the global longitudinal PSS.
Results
The baseline mean segmental PSS in the sildenafil group changed by 52%, −3 ± 1% at baseline versus −7 ± 2% after sildenafil intake, P = 0.01. However, no significant changes were reported in the placebo group, −7 ± 3% at baseline versus −7.25 ± 3%, P = 0.1. The baseline mean global longitudinal PSS in the sildenafil group changed by 9% (−15 ± 4% at baseline versus −18 ± 3% after sildenafil, P = 0.03). In placebo patients, the change was only 3% from baseline (−14.8 ± 2% at baseline compared to −15 ± 2% after placebo intake, P = 0.1). Sildenafil was well tolerated without clinical or hemodynamic deterioration after its intake.
Conclusion
Sildenafil intake is safe in patients with stable CAD, it induced marginal improvements in the peak systolic strain of different myocardial ischemic territories.
Objectives
To test the safety of sildenafil in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods
Sixty-one patients with stable CAD, documented by coronary angiography were included in this phase I study. Patients were randomized to either single dose sildenafil or matched placebo. Speckle tracking echocardiography was done at baseline and 60 min after sildenafil/placebo intake to calculate peak systolic strain (PSS) of the most severely affected myocardial segments and the global longitudinal PSS.
Results
The baseline mean segmental PSS in the sildenafil group changed by 52%, −3 ± 1% at baseline versus −7 ± 2% after sildenafil intake, P = 0.01. However, no significant changes were reported in the placebo group, −7 ± 3% at baseline versus −7.25 ± 3%, P = 0.1. The baseline mean global longitudinal PSS in the sildenafil group changed by 9% (−15 ± 4% at baseline versus −18 ± 3% after sildenafil, P = 0.03). In placebo patients, the change was only 3% from baseline (−14.8 ± 2% at baseline compared to −15 ± 2% after placebo intake, P = 0.1). Sildenafil was well tolerated without clinical or hemodynamic deterioration after its intake.
Conclusion
Sildenafil intake is safe in patients with stable CAD, it induced marginal improvements in the peak systolic strain of different myocardial ischemic territories.
Staff Members - Benha University