Staff Members - Benha University
A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis
• 2002
Publication Information
Authors
Abdelmonem M Hamed, Li Wang, Manjula Misra, Douglas D Koch
Keywords
lasik, biomtery, k reading,
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of computerized videokeratography, keratometry, and the Gaussian optics formula for measuring corneal refractive power in patients after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
Design
Noncomparative case series.
Participants
One hundred eyes of 63 patients (mean age, 45.0 ± 10.9 [standard deviation] years) who underwent LASIK were included in the study.
Methods
Using the clinical history method as the standard, we evaluated the accuracy of values of corneal refractive power derived from computerized videokeratography (the EffRP value of the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System, which averages corneal refractive power over the central 3 mm), keratometry (K), the Gaussian optics formula (GauRP), and values of EffRP and keratometry as modified according to the amount of LASIK-induced refractive change.
Main outcome measures
Correlation of measured corneal power values to those obtained using clinical history method (HisRP).
Results
Although the values for HisRP were significantly correlated with postoperative EffRP and K values and with GauRP, postoperative EffRP and K values were higher than HisRP (0.87 ± 0.68 diopters [D] and 1.16 ± 1.10 D, respectively), and GauRP were lower than HisRP (0.44 ± 0.66 D) (P < 0.001 for all three comparisons). The differences between HisRP and both postoperative EffRP and K values increased significantly with the amount of myopic correction. The most accurate results were obtained by modifying the postoperative values of EffRP according to the amount of LASIK-induced refractive change; 70% of these values were within ± 0.5 D and 94% within ± 1 D of HisRP values.
Conclusions
Using the clinical history method as the standard, we found that the most accurate method for determining corneal refractive power in post-LASIK eyes was to adjust the postoperative corneal measurement according to the amount of LASIK-induced refractive change.
Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of computerized videokeratography, keratometry, and the Gaussian optics formula for measuring corneal refractive power in patients after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
Design
Noncomparative case series.
Participants
One hundred eyes of 63 patients (mean age, 45.0 ± 10.9 [standard deviation] years) who underwent LASIK were included in the study.
Methods
Using the clinical history method as the standard, we evaluated the accuracy of values of corneal refractive power derived from computerized videokeratography (the EffRP value of the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System, which averages corneal refractive power over the central 3 mm), keratometry (K), the Gaussian optics formula (GauRP), and values of EffRP and keratometry as modified according to the amount of LASIK-induced refractive change.
Main outcome measures
Correlation of measured corneal power values to those obtained using clinical history method (HisRP).
Results
Although the values for HisRP were significantly correlated with postoperative EffRP and K values and with GauRP, postoperative EffRP and K values were higher than HisRP (0.87 ± 0.68 diopters [D] and 1.16 ± 1.10 D, respectively), and GauRP were lower than HisRP (0.44 ± 0.66 D) (P < 0.001 for all three comparisons). The differences between HisRP and both postoperative EffRP and K values increased significantly with the amount of myopic correction. The most accurate results were obtained by modifying the postoperative values of EffRP according to the amount of LASIK-induced refractive change; 70% of these values were within ± 0.5 D and 94% within ± 1 D of HisRP values.
Conclusions
Using the clinical history method as the standard, we found that the most accurate method for determining corneal refractive power in post-LASIK eyes was to adjust the postoperative corneal measurement according to the amount of LASIK-induced refractive change.