Theme-Logo
  • Login
  • Home
  • Course
  • Publication
  • Theses
  • Reports
  • Published books
  • Workshops / Conferences
  • Supervised PhD
  • Supervised MSc
  • Supervised projects
  • Education
  • Language skills
  • Positions
  • Memberships and awards
  • Committees
  • Experience
  • Scientific activites
  • In links
  • Outgoinglinks
  • News
  • Gallery
publication name Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) Versus Conventional Ordinary Dressing In Management Of Diabetic Foot Ulcer & Wound
Authors Atef AbdelGhany Yousef, MD; Mohamed AbdelHakim Mansour, MD; Ahmed Khairy Allam, MD; Kareem Mohamed Ibrahim, M.B.B.Ch.
year 2017
keywords Platelet Rich Plasma, Conventional Ordinary Dressing, Diabetic Foot Wound, Outcomes.
journal
volume Not Available
issue Not Available
pages Not Available
publisher Not Available
Local/International International
Paper Link Not Available
Full paper download
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract

Purposes: Find out advantages & efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma versus conventional ordinary dressing in management of diabetic foot ulcer & wound. Background: Diabetic foot ulcer treatment places a considerable strain on the medical system, with long waiting time for healing in the public hospital system. Platelet Rich Plasma allows efficient treatment of many patients with hemostatic, anti-inflammatory and analgesic substance. Patients and methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 diabetic patients having non-healing feet ulcers; Patients were randomly allocated by using a computer generated random number table into two groups according to the dressing method performed; Group A: Conventional ordinary dressing (N=30 (50%)), Group B: PRP dressing (N=30 (50%)). Follow-up period was for 3-monthes. Results: Most of ulcers were healed within the estimated time for this study (12 weeks) and There were satisfactory results (less complications) in PRP group (B); infection, exudates and Pain which were observed in 5 cases (16%), 3 cases (10%), 10 cases (33.3%) respectively as compared to group (A); 8 cases (26.6%), 12 cases (40%), 18 cases (60%) respectively. Also the rate of healing was good in group (B) with p-value

Benha University © 2023 Designed and developed by portal team - Benha University