RV Dysfunction after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), Single Center Experience
• 2020
Publication Information
Authors
Sheeren Khaled, Ehab Kasem, Ahmed Fadel, Yusuf Alzahrani, Khadijah Banjar, Wafa’a Al-Zahrani, Hajar
Alsulami and Mazad Ali Allhyani
Keywords
Not Available
Journal
Not Available
Publisher
Not Available
Volume
Not Available
Issue
Not Available
Pages
Not Available
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Not Available
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Aim: To assess the change and analyze the possible predictors in RV function post CABG
Methods and Results: This cross-sectional retrospective study enrolled all patients undergoing isolated CABG and compared those
with postoperative RV systolic dysfunction versus patients without RV dysfunction. We included 164 patients underwent CABG with
a mean age of 56.1 ± 12.2 years old. Those patients were classified in to two groups: Group I (64.6%) patients with postoperative RV
dysfunction and group II (35.4%) without RV dysfunction postoperatively. We summarize our data as followings: 1) Demographic
and clinical data: group I patients had prevalence of DM and obesity were compared to group II patients (p = 0.02 and 0.05 respectively),
otherwise all other clinical predictors didn’t differ between the groups. 2) Echocardiography, angiography and operative data:
patients of group I had higher rates of preoperative larger LV, LV systolic dysfunction, reduced TAPSE values and severe diseased
coronaries compared to group II patients. 3) Change in RV function after CABG and prognosis: There was significant deterioration of
RV function post CABG in early follow up postoperative period (13% preoperatively VS 65% postoperatively; p = 0.04). Patients who
had better preoperative RV function maintained it postoperatively compared to patients with baseline RV dysfunction, p = 0.04. RV
dysfunction in our study is not associated with increased in-hospital mortality.
Conclusion: CABG has negative impact on RV function. Obesity and uncontrolled DM show role in RV dysfunction post operatively.
Evaluation of RV function in perioperative period is of future challenging
Methods and Results: This cross-sectional retrospective study enrolled all patients undergoing isolated CABG and compared those
with postoperative RV systolic dysfunction versus patients without RV dysfunction. We included 164 patients underwent CABG with
a mean age of 56.1 ± 12.2 years old. Those patients were classified in to two groups: Group I (64.6%) patients with postoperative RV
dysfunction and group II (35.4%) without RV dysfunction postoperatively. We summarize our data as followings: 1) Demographic
and clinical data: group I patients had prevalence of DM and obesity were compared to group II patients (p = 0.02 and 0.05 respectively),
otherwise all other clinical predictors didn’t differ between the groups. 2) Echocardiography, angiography and operative data:
patients of group I had higher rates of preoperative larger LV, LV systolic dysfunction, reduced TAPSE values and severe diseased
coronaries compared to group II patients. 3) Change in RV function after CABG and prognosis: There was significant deterioration of
RV function post CABG in early follow up postoperative period (13% preoperatively VS 65% postoperatively; p = 0.04). Patients who
had better preoperative RV function maintained it postoperatively compared to patients with baseline RV dysfunction, p = 0.04. RV
dysfunction in our study is not associated with increased in-hospital mortality.
Conclusion: CABG has negative impact on RV function. Obesity and uncontrolled DM show role in RV dysfunction post operatively.
Evaluation of RV function in perioperative period is of future challenging
Staff Members - Benha University