Reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the European Society of Cardiology EurObservational programme acute cardiovascular care-European association of PCI ST-elevation myocardial infarction registry
European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care • 2022
Publication Information
Authors
ACVC-EAPCI EORP ACS STEMI
investigators group of the ESC
Keywords
Cardiogenic shock • ST-elevation myocardial infarction • Primary percutaneous coronary intervention • Registry •
Reperfusion therapy
Journal
European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care
Publisher
Oxford Academics
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
481-490
publication.type
International
Paper Link
Open Link
Supplementary Materials
Not Available
Abstract
Aims To determine the current state of the use of reperfusion and adjunctive therapies and in-hospital outcomes in European
Society of Cardiology (ESC) member and affiliated countries for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
(STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS).
Methods
and results
ESC EurObservational Research Programme prospective international cohort study of admissions with STEMI within 24 h of
symptom onset (196 centres; 26 ESC member and 3 affiliated countries). Of 11 462 patients enrolled, 448 (3.9%) had CS.
Patients with compared to patients without CS, less frequently received primary percutaneous coronary intervention
(PCI) (65.5% vs. 72.2%) and fibrinolysis (15.9% vs. 19.0), and more often had no reperfusion therapy (19.0% vs. 8.5%).
Mechanical support devices (intraaortic ballon pump 11.2%, extracoporeal membrane oxygenation 0.7%, other 1.1%)
were used infrequently in CS. Bleeding definition academic research consortium 2–5 bleeding complications (10.1% vs.
3.0%, P,0.01) and stroke (4.2% vs. 0.9%, P,0.01) occurred more frequently in patients with CS. In-hospital mortality
was 10-fold higher (35.5% vs. 3.1%) in patients with CS. Mortality in patients with CS in the groups with PCI, fibrinolysis,
and no reperfusion therapy were 27.4%, 36.6%, and 62.4%, respectively.
Conclusion In this multi-national registry, patients with STEMI complicated by CS less frequently receive reperfusion therapy than
patients with STEMI without CS. Early mortality in patients with CS not treated with primary PCI is very high.
Therefore, strategies to improve clinical outcome in STEMI with CS are needed.
Society of Cardiology (ESC) member and affiliated countries for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
(STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS).
Methods
and results
ESC EurObservational Research Programme prospective international cohort study of admissions with STEMI within 24 h of
symptom onset (196 centres; 26 ESC member and 3 affiliated countries). Of 11 462 patients enrolled, 448 (3.9%) had CS.
Patients with compared to patients without CS, less frequently received primary percutaneous coronary intervention
(PCI) (65.5% vs. 72.2%) and fibrinolysis (15.9% vs. 19.0), and more often had no reperfusion therapy (19.0% vs. 8.5%).
Mechanical support devices (intraaortic ballon pump 11.2%, extracoporeal membrane oxygenation 0.7%, other 1.1%)
were used infrequently in CS. Bleeding definition academic research consortium 2–5 bleeding complications (10.1% vs.
3.0%, P,0.01) and stroke (4.2% vs. 0.9%, P,0.01) occurred more frequently in patients with CS. In-hospital mortality
was 10-fold higher (35.5% vs. 3.1%) in patients with CS. Mortality in patients with CS in the groups with PCI, fibrinolysis,
and no reperfusion therapy were 27.4%, 36.6%, and 62.4%, respectively.
Conclusion In this multi-national registry, patients with STEMI complicated by CS less frequently receive reperfusion therapy than
patients with STEMI without CS. Early mortality in patients with CS not treated with primary PCI is very high.
Therefore, strategies to improve clinical outcome in STEMI with CS are needed.
Staff Members - Benha University