Banner

Is there a place for virtual reality simulators in assessment of competency in percutaneous renal access?

World Journal of Urology • 2015
العودة
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون Yasser A Noureldin · Nader Fahmy · Maurice Anidjar · Sero Andonian
الكلمات المفتاحية Not Available
المجلة العلمية World Journal of Urology
الناشر Not Available
المجلد Not Available
العدد Not Available
الصفحات Not Available
publication.type International
رابط البحث Not Available
المواد المرفقة Not Available
الملخص
To assess competency of urology post-graduate trainees (PGTs) in percutaneous renal access (PCA). METHODS: Upon obtaining ethics approval and informed consents, PGTs between post-graduate years (PGY-3 to PGY-5) from all four urology programs in Québec were recruited. PCA competency of each participant was assessed objectively by performing task 4 on the PERC Mentor™ simulator, where they had to correctly access and pop 7 balloons in 7 different renal calyces and subjectively by the validated Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy-Global Rating Scale (PCNL-GRS). RESULTS: A total of 26 PGTs with a mean age of 29.2 ± 0.7 years participated in this study. When compared with the 21 PGTs without practice, all 5 PGTs who had practiced on the simulator were competent (p = 0.03), performed the task with significantly shorter operative time (13.9 ± 0.7 vs. 4.4 ± 0.4 min; p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (9.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.4 ± 0.4 min; p < 0.001), and had significantly higher PCNL-GRS scores (13 ± 0.6 vs. 20.6 ± 1; p < 0.001) and successful attempts to access renal calyces (23 ± 5 vs. 68.7 ± 11; p = 0.001). According to a pass score of 13/25, thirteen PGTs were competent. Competent PGTs performed the task with significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (9.8 vs. 6.5 min; p = 0.01) and higher percentage of successful attempts to access renal calyces (p < 0.001), higher PCNL-GRS scores (p < 0.001), and lower complications (p = 0.01).