أعضاء هيئة التدريس - جامعة بنها
Assessment of noninvasive predictors of bladder outlet obstruction and acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic enlargement
• 2020
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Ashraf Abdel-Aal a
, Tarek El-Karamany a
, Ahmed Mahmoud Al-Adl a,
*,
Osama Abdel-Wahab a
, Hesham Farouk b
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Not Available
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
Local
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Abstract Purpose: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of intravesical prostatic
protrusion (IPP), detrusor wall thickness (DWT), prostate volume (PV) and serum prostate specific
antigen (PSA) levels for detecting bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and predicting acute urinary
retention (AUR) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.
Patients and methods: In all, 135 men who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms due to
benign prostatic enlargement were enrolled in the study; among them, 50 presented with AUR. Thirty
normal men in the same age group were included and represented a control group for normative data.
Their evaluation included a digital rectal examination, International Prostate Symptom Score and
quality-of-life question, uroflowmetry and serum total PSA assay. Transabdominal ultrasonography
was used to measure the PV, IPP DWT and post-void residual urine volume. Pressure-flow urodynamic studies were used as the reference standard test for BOO, differentiating obstructed from unobstructed bladders. DWT, IPP, PV and total PSA level served as index tests. To compare the usefulness
protrusion (IPP), detrusor wall thickness (DWT), prostate volume (PV) and serum prostate specific
antigen (PSA) levels for detecting bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and predicting acute urinary
retention (AUR) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.
Patients and methods: In all, 135 men who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms due to
benign prostatic enlargement were enrolled in the study; among them, 50 presented with AUR. Thirty
normal men in the same age group were included and represented a control group for normative data.
Their evaluation included a digital rectal examination, International Prostate Symptom Score and
quality-of-life question, uroflowmetry and serum total PSA assay. Transabdominal ultrasonography
was used to measure the PV, IPP DWT and post-void residual urine volume. Pressure-flow urodynamic studies were used as the reference standard test for BOO, differentiating obstructed from unobstructed bladders. DWT, IPP, PV and total PSA level served as index tests. To compare the usefulness