أعضاء هيئة التدريس - جامعة بنها
Multislice computed tomography vs. intravenous urography for planning supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised clinical trial
• 2013
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون
Osama A. El-Wahab a, Magdy A. El-Tabey a,*, Ehab El-Barky a,Shabieb A. El-Baky a, Adel El-Falah a, Medhat Refaat b
الكلمات المفتاحية
Not Available
المجلة العلمية
Not Available
الناشر
Not Available
المجلد
Not Available
العدد
Not Available
الصفحات
Not Available
publication.type
International
رابط البحث
Not Available
المواد المرفقة
Not Available
الملخص
Abstract Objective: To compare the outcome of treatment planning using multislice
computed tomography (CT) or intravenous urography (IVU) for supine percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Patients and methods: The study included 60 patients with renal stones, all treated
by supine PCNL, between March 2011 and October 2012. The patients were divided
randomly into two equal groups; in group 1 30 patients had the PCNL access
planned based on IVU findings, and in group 2 the PCNL access was planned based
on multislice CT images. All patients were suitable for PCNL, based on a plain
abdominal film and ultrasonography, and with a body mass index of
computed tomography (CT) or intravenous urography (IVU) for supine percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Patients and methods: The study included 60 patients with renal stones, all treated
by supine PCNL, between March 2011 and October 2012. The patients were divided
randomly into two equal groups; in group 1 30 patients had the PCNL access
planned based on IVU findings, and in group 2 the PCNL access was planned based
on multislice CT images. All patients were suitable for PCNL, based on a plain
abdominal film and ultrasonography, and with a body mass index of