Banner

Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) vs. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy (RIRS) for Renal Stones >2cm

• 2020
العودة
معلومات البحث
المؤلفون A. M.El Shazly1, A. A.Taleb1 , A. S.Ahmed1 and M. M. farag1
الكلمات المفتاحية Not Available
المجلة العلمية Not Available
الناشر Not Available
المجلد Not Available
العدد Not Available
الصفحات Not Available
publication.type Local
رابط البحث Not Available
المواد المرفقة Not Available
الملخص
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mini percutaneous nephro-lithotripsy (mini PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treatment of renal stones larger than 20mm in its longest diameter.
Patients & Methods: In a prospective randomized study including 40 patients divided into two groups each 20 patient. Group A included 12 males and 8 females with age ranged from 15 to 62 years had mini PCNL for renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Group B included 8 males and 12 females with age ranged from 18 to 65 years old had RIRS. Flexible ureteroscopy was used for pelvic and calyceal stones using holmium:YAG laser (dusting approach). In both groups the procedure outcome in terms of Operative time, Blood loss, hospital stay, complications using modified Clavien grading system , the need of auxiliary procedures , stone free rates after 3 weeks by using CTUT, were evaluated statistically.
Results: Statistical analysis of the data showed that there was insignificant difference between the {mean ± SD} of the BMI in patients of group A which was {27.850±3.183} kg/m2; while in patients of group B was {29.700±7.927} kg/m2 . Regarding stone size, there was insignificant difference between the {mean ± SD} of group A which was 2.57±0.22mm, while in group B was 2.6±0.24mm. Regarding the operative time the {mean ± SD} of group A was 104.43±14.79 minutes which was significantly (P